Navigating the complex and opaque naturalization process
The question of who deserves citizenship in Singapore is increasingly contentious. The debate has been fueled by politicians like PSP’s Leong Mun Wai, who asked for data on “new citizens” to assess if foreign-born citizens are taking jobs from locals. While his concerns seem to “other” naturalized citizens, the broader issue lies in the opaque naturalization process itself. The system lacks transparency, leaving rejected applicants like Leila, who was born and raised in Singapore, confused and uncertain about their place in the country.
Many, like Leila and her sister Yasmin, who have lived and contributed to Singapore for decades, are left wondering what went wrong. Despite contributing to society through their professions, the two sisters, both well-qualified and successful, were rejected without explanation. This has left them questioning the criteria for citizenship and their future in Singapore.
The emergence of immigration consulting services adds another layer of complexity. These consultants, while not government-affiliated, aim to help prospective citizens navigate the application process, which remains shrouded in mystery. They suggest that sectors like healthcare and tech are favored, but their advice is based on speculation rather than official guidelines. The lack of clear criteria fuels frustration for those rejected, as seen in Leila’s story.
At the heart of the issue is the need for transparency. While Singapore has the right to selective naturalization, clearer guidelines and feedback would help ease concerns about exclusion and promote social cohesion. With challenges like a low fertility rate and an aging population on the horizon, Singapore needs to align its long-term goals with a more open discussion on citizenship and belonging.
Leila, Yasmin, and many others continue to wait for answers, hoping for a more inclusive future that values their contributions and recognizes them as part of the Singaporean fabric.
