Honoring Our Heritage: The Case for Adaptive Reuse of Singapore’s En Bloc Buildings

Exploring the potential for preserving iconic structures amidst the push for modernization.

SINGAPORE: In the quest to create space for the future, Singapore often turns to demolition, a necessary step on a 728.6 km² island that is smaller than New York City. As old buildings like the Pearl Bank Apartment (1976-2018) are torn down to make way for new developments, questions arise about the balance between sentimentality and practicality in urban planning.

While the conversation around conservation typically presents sentimentality and pragmatism as opposing forces, a middle ground may exist through the concept of adaptive reuse. This approach allows for the preservation of key structural elements of notable buildings while adapting them for new commercial uses or public amenities. A prime example is the former Bukit Timah Fire Station, which is set to become a community hub for nature and heritage enthusiasts.

However, the challenge remains: which buildings should be saved from demolition in favor of adaptive reuse? Beyond the preservation of colonial heritage structures and the Golden Mile Complex, there’s a lack of clarity on which sites are deemed worthy of such consideration.

RICE has previously explored this topic in an interview with Docomomo, an advocacy group focused on the preservation of brutalist architecture. They argue for adaptive reuse as a more sustainable alternative to the traditional teardown-and-rebuild model. Unfortunately, developers in Singapore are often hesitant to embrace this mindset due to high costs and complicated planning processes.

Developers play a crucial role in shifting public perception, and there are precedents for successful adaptive reuse beyond the Golden Mile. For example, Boat Quay has transformed the Singapore River while retaining its historical significance as a bustling port.

Here are three buildings currently in en bloc discussions that deserve a second look for adaptive reuse:

Pandan Valley
Pandan Valley, built in 1979 and designed by Tan Cheng Siong of Archynamics Architects, marked a significant shift toward high-density urban living in post-independence Singapore. Its unique structure harmonizes with the natural landscape, offering both beauty and functionality. Preserving this building could involve developing additional floors for commercial purposes, fostering a vibrant community hub that enhances residents’ quality of life.

People’s Park Complex
Completed in 1973, People’s Park Complex is celebrated as a milestone in Singapore’s architectural history, known for its innovative mixed-use design. However, the building has faced neglect over the years, leading to plumbing issues and deterioration. A thoughtful renovation could restore its iconic facade while revitalizing its interior, ensuring it continues to serve both residents and businesses in the heart of Chinatown.

Beauty World Centre
Often overlooked, Beauty World Centre has a rich history as a hub for local stall owners displaced by fires in the 1980s. Its mixed-use design offers a unique opportunity for adaptive reuse that appeals to younger Singaporeans. Envisioning the space with co-working areas, fitness studios, and boutique shops could breathe new life into this iconic building.

Ultimately, the conversation around adaptive reuse is speculative, but many Singaporeans likely agree on the importance of preserving the unique and resilient characteristics of our urban landscape. Balancing the need for development with a respect for our architectural heritage is vital for a city that prides itself on its rich history and cultural identity.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *