The rise of spin classes in public spaces sparks debate on fitness culture and social privilege.
SINGAPORE: If you know someone who loves spin classes, chances are they’ve invited you to join them, posted about it on Instagram, or brought it up in conversation. Spin classes—featuring participants on stationary bikes pedaling to high-energy music under strobe lights—have become a prominent fitness trend.
While typically held in private studios, some classes now take place in public spaces. A recent session at Jewel Changi Airport faced backlash on Reddit, with critics labeling it an “eyesore” and complaining about blocked walkways. Comments ranged from quips about the futility of spinning “going nowhere” to disdain for the spectacle itself.
The Spin Class Phenomenon
Spin classes have undeniably pedaled their way into the limelight. Known for their vibrant energy, loyal community, and Instagram-worthy moments, these classes have also drawn criticism for their perceived exclusivity.
The stereotype is hard to ignore: office workers decked in high-end athletic wear, sipping premium lattes, and making their way to spin sessions that double as social and fitness events. While some participate for the camaraderie or social media clout, others are genuinely drawn to the physical and mental benefits of this intense cardio workout.
For many women, spin classes also offer a safe space free from unwanted attention, making them an appealing fitness choice. Public sessions, like the one at Jewel, add novelty and break the monotony of traditional gym routines.
Public Space and Private Privilege
Criticism of spin classes in public spaces often stems from deeper issues. Public spin sessions, such as the one at Jewel, spark debates about privilege and exclusivity. To detractors, these events seem to flaunt financial capacity—paying for the privilege to occupy public spaces while inadvertently disrupting the peace.
The sight of stationary bikes in a public setting, complete with strobe lights and loud music, strikes many as absurd. Critics point to the frivolity of transforming a practical activity like cycling into a stylized and conspicuous spectacle.
This critique extends beyond spin classes. Similar public fitness events, like open-air yoga or tai chi sessions, rarely receive the same level of vitriol. The resentment seems specific to spin, perhaps because of its association with affluence and exclusivity.
Balancing Criticism and Acceptance
The dislike for spin classes is not new, but public displays amplify the division between enthusiasts and detractors. While some critique the inconvenience caused by these events, others veer into unnecessary personal attacks on participants.
At its core, the tension reveals broader societal frustrations around privilege and the use of public spaces. Striking a balance between valid criticism and unwarranted disdain is key. Criticizing the event’s logistics is fair; targeting individuals for their choice of workout is less so.
Ultimately, public spin classes, like any fitness trend, reflect the evolving ways people approach health and community. Whether indoors or out, perhaps the best approach is to let the wheels spin while respecting the shared spaces they occupy.
